I used this listing the way I actually use a scam checker: paste a URL I do not already trust, wait for the score, then decide whether to keep going. That is the right job for a page like this. The useful part is not a slogan about "safety." It is the handful of signals that are hard to fake in thirty seconds: does the domain look newly registered, does the WHOIS look empty, does the report contradict the polished homepage.
Where these tools fall over is when they demand an account before they will show the report. If I am already suspicious of the site in the clipboard, I am not in the mood to create yet another login. Scam Alerts at least lets you run a public URL through the checker first. I wish the listing here said that more plainly, because that is the difference between a directory card you click and one you skip.
I treat a medium score as "slow down," not as a green light. I still look at the registrar date and whether the company name on the site matches anything in the WHOIS. If those disagree, I leave. The same habit applies to other public lookup pages. For public TikTok stories I use https://toktoolset.com/ the same way: public handle only, no login, and an empty result means the story is gone or private, not that I should keep retrying.
One nit on this Haveinlist card: the Perimeter Center address reads like an office-suite default. That does not make the checker fake, but it does mean I judge the tool by the report it produces, not by the map pin. If the report on a URL I already know is shady comes back clean, I would trust this listing less. On the two throwaway shops I tried, the scores lined up with what I expected, so I am leaving the review.
Restaurants